<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PLR Articles, the Microstock of Written Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/</link>
	<description>Random Ramblings on Life and Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:20:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nez</title>
		<link>http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Nez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Hi JEMi,

Thanks so much for coming by.

PLR never occurred to me either until I read Jame&#039;s post and investigated further. Simply Googling &quot;PLR&quot; brings back tons of sites! Looks like a whole industry unto itself.

I must say that your blog certainly has some of the most well thought out, original content I&#039;ve read anywhere.

Hope you&#039;ll come by again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JEMi,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for coming by.</p>
<p>PLR never occurred to me either until I read Jame&#8217;s post and investigated further. Simply Googling &#8220;PLR&#8221; brings back tons of sites! Looks like a whole industry unto itself.</p>
<p>I must say that your blog certainly has some of the most well thought out, original content I&#8217;ve read anywhere.</p>
<p>Hope you&#8217;ll come by again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEMi @ InMyHeels</title>
		<link>http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>JEMi @ InMyHeels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Hey Nez- 


whoa I have never heard of PLR, let alone think of it.  It bothers me because - without PLR, there is already a tendency to see recycled content.  Now with the Microstock of Written content?!  I&#039;m going to check out that link you provided

&quot;What will happen in the end, I think, will be up to us, the bloggers who care about what we want to say, and ultimately who care about our readers.&quot;
I couldn&#039;t agree with you more.

&lt;em&gt;JEMi @ InMyHeels&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.inmyheels.com/uninhibited-10-ways-to-set-yourself-free-part-1/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Uninhibited:  10 Ways to Set Yourself Free (Part 1)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nez- </p>
<p>whoa I have never heard of PLR, let alone think of it.  It bothers me because &#8211; without PLR, there is already a tendency to see recycled content.  Now with the Microstock of Written content?!  I&#8217;m going to check out that link you provided</p>
<p>&#8220;What will happen in the end, I think, will be up to us, the bloggers who care about what we want to say, and ultimately who care about our readers.&#8221;<br />
I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.</p>
<p><em>JEMi @ InMyHeels&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.inmyheels.com/uninhibited-10-ways-to-set-yourself-free-part-1/' rel="nofollow">Uninhibited:  10 Ways to Set Yourself Free (Part 1)</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nez</title>
		<link>http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Nez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>@Barbara: That&#039;s a really good point you made. Technorati lists how many blogs are created, but we don&#039;t really know how many stagnate. I&#039;d have to guess that the blog attrition rate is less than the &quot;birth&quot; rate.

@Catherine and James: It&#039;s obvious that a certain number of writers/photographers who use this business model ARE making money, just as I&#039;m sure a small percentage of those &quot;buy a home for no money down!&quot; real estate &quot;gamblers&quot; make money, too. But how many do not?

@Harry: I&#039;ll address more in a future post (I guess this will be my first &quot;unofficial&quot; multi-part post.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Barbara: That&#8217;s a really good point you made. Technorati lists how many blogs are created, but we don&#8217;t really know how many stagnate. I&#8217;d have to guess that the blog attrition rate is less than the &#8220;birth&#8221; rate.</p>
<p>@Catherine and James: It&#8217;s obvious that a certain number of writers/photographers who use this business model ARE making money, just as I&#8217;m sure a small percentage of those &#8220;buy a home for no money down!&#8221; real estate &#8220;gamblers&#8221; make money, too. But how many do not?</p>
<p>@Harry: I&#8217;ll address more in a future post (I guess this will be my first &#8220;unofficial&#8221; multi-part post.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrison McLeod</title>
		<link>http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrison McLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Barbara about the photos. We thought Flikr would be a great resource, but I wasted more time on a search going through Joe Blow&#039;s personal vacation pictures under the keywords I plugged in and not finding a damned thing I could use. I finally gave up and went back to iStock.

iStock has a lot of excellent photographers selling their work there and I&#039;m happy to use my credits on them. There&#039;s also a lot of crap and no matter what venue you choose, whether it&#039;s writing or photography, you&#039;re always going to get the people who find a way to make a quick buck and ruin it for the rest of us.

&lt;em&gt;Harrison McLeod&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MenWithPens/~3/242651522/how-to-be-cool-with-your-network-contacts&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How to be Cool with Your Network Contacts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Barbara about the photos. We thought Flikr would be a great resource, but I wasted more time on a search going through Joe Blow&#8217;s personal vacation pictures under the keywords I plugged in and not finding a damned thing I could use. I finally gave up and went back to iStock.</p>
<p>iStock has a lot of excellent photographers selling their work there and I&#8217;m happy to use my credits on them. There&#8217;s also a lot of crap and no matter what venue you choose, whether it&#8217;s writing or photography, you&#8217;re always going to get the people who find a way to make a quick buck and ruin it for the rest of us.</p>
<p><em>Harrison McLeod&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MenWithPens/~3/242651522/how-to-be-cool-with-your-network-contacts' rel="nofollow">How to be Cool with Your Network Contacts</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Chartrand - Men with Pens</title>
		<link>http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>James Chartrand - Men with Pens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>@ CatherineL - The problem is that people who write this crappy content make a considerable amount of money. More so than had they written original content. That&#039;s what makes PLR appealing. It&#039;s lucrative. Kind of like whoring on St-Catherine&#039;s street.

What webmasters don&#039;t realize is that they get a higher ROI from original content. Stupid.

@ Nez - Thank you for this article (and the link). I think you&#039;ve done a fantastic job at looking a little deeper into the issue. You&#039;ve brought up some great points. 

Regarding photographers - I know a professional photographer who used to earn about 10k a day. That&#039;s 10 thousand dollars every 24 hours. He is now unemployed and makes about 50$ a month selling stock photography. Welcome to the world of killing off professionals with cheap.

&lt;em&gt;James Chartrand - Men with Pens&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MenWithPens/~3/242651522/how-to-be-cool-with-your-network-contacts&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How to be Cool with Your Network Contacts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ CatherineL &#8211; The problem is that people who write this crappy content make a considerable amount of money. More so than had they written original content. That&#8217;s what makes PLR appealing. It&#8217;s lucrative. Kind of like whoring on St-Catherine&#8217;s street.</p>
<p>What webmasters don&#8217;t realize is that they get a higher ROI from original content. Stupid.</p>
<p>@ Nez &#8211; Thank you for this article (and the link). I think you&#8217;ve done a fantastic job at looking a little deeper into the issue. You&#8217;ve brought up some great points. </p>
<p>Regarding photographers &#8211; I know a professional photographer who used to earn about 10k a day. That&#8217;s 10 thousand dollars every 24 hours. He is now unemployed and makes about 50$ a month selling stock photography. Welcome to the world of killing off professionals with cheap.</p>
<p><em>James Chartrand &#8211; Men with Pens&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MenWithPens/~3/242651522/how-to-be-cool-with-your-network-contacts' rel="nofollow">How to be Cool with Your Network Contacts</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CatherineL</title>
		<link>http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>CatherineL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Great post Nez.  I should imagine that the writers of this crappy content make very little.  As you say - it&#039;s the middlemen who profit.  And at the end of the day, is it any better than spam?

I feel sorry for the real writers.  At one end of the spectrum you get thousands of people willing to churn out any old crap to make a few bucks.  

And many webmasters use them because they can&#039;t afford to pay for solid content.  But, in the meantime, the decent writers can&#039;t get any work, because everyone is buying the crap.

&lt;em&gt;CatherineL&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SuccessPasscode/~3/242635902/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The New Spam - How Do We Deal With It?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Nez.  I should imagine that the writers of this crappy content make very little.  As you say &#8211; it&#8217;s the middlemen who profit.  And at the end of the day, is it any better than spam?</p>
<p>I feel sorry for the real writers.  At one end of the spectrum you get thousands of people willing to churn out any old crap to make a few bucks.  </p>
<p>And many webmasters use them because they can&#8217;t afford to pay for solid content.  But, in the meantime, the decent writers can&#8217;t get any work, because everyone is buying the crap.</p>
<p><em>CatherineL&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SuccessPasscode/~3/242635902/' rel="nofollow">The New Spam &#8211; How Do We Deal With It?</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nezsez.com/plr-articles-the-microstock-of-written-content/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Hi Nez,

We&#039;ve discussed this on my blog before and some of us are of the belief that when it comes to blogs, we would like to see a report on how many blogs remain stagnant as bloggers drop out.  I know since I started blogging I have authors (who used to visit me) who are either on hiatus or have quit.  

That is sad how photography has lost its value.  I hope those that are good have other sources to distribute their work, as some of it is phenomenal.  Although Flickr reports they have millions of images, a lot of it is personal pictures that may not be useful for websites or blogs.  

The &quot;canned articles&quot; are usually used by those looking to make a quick buck from their ads.  I&#039;m sure it works, but by using it the issue of duplicate content may come into play.

&lt;em&gt;Barbara&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bloggingwithoutablog/DWWZ/~3/241917833/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blogging?  Watch Your Language&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nez,</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve discussed this on my blog before and some of us are of the belief that when it comes to blogs, we would like to see a report on how many blogs remain stagnant as bloggers drop out.  I know since I started blogging I have authors (who used to visit me) who are either on hiatus or have quit.  </p>
<p>That is sad how photography has lost its value.  I hope those that are good have other sources to distribute their work, as some of it is phenomenal.  Although Flickr reports they have millions of images, a lot of it is personal pictures that may not be useful for websites or blogs.  </p>
<p>The &#8220;canned articles&#8221; are usually used by those looking to make a quick buck from their ads.  I&#8217;m sure it works, but by using it the issue of duplicate content may come into play.</p>
<p><em>Barbara&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bloggingwithoutablog/DWWZ/~3/241917833/' rel="nofollow">Blogging?  Watch Your Language</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
